{"id":50270,"date":"2025-10-28T15:07:29","date_gmt":"2025-10-28T15:07:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/musicianvoice.com\/index.php\/2025\/10\/28\/stevem-wilson-breaks-down-his-work-with-the-who-dead-stones-sabbath\/"},"modified":"2025-10-28T15:07:29","modified_gmt":"2025-10-28T15:07:29","slug":"stevem-wilson-breaks-down-his-work-with-the-who-dead-stones-sabbath","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/musicianvoice.com\/index.php\/2025\/10\/28\/stevem-wilson-breaks-down-his-work-with-the-who-dead-stones-sabbath\/","title":{"rendered":"Stevem Wilson Breaks Down His Work With the Who, Dead, Stones, Sabbath"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tIf <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rollingstone.com\/t\/steven-wilson\/\" id=\"auto-tag_steven-wilson\" data-tag=\"steven-wilson\">Steven Wilson<\/a> did nothing with his career besides form Porcupine Tree, he\u2019d still go down in music history as the leader of arguably the greatest prog rock band of the 1990s and 2000s. And the innovative solo work that followed only solidified his reputation, earning him a substantial cult following that allows him to tour all across the planet.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tBut Wilson\u2019s life took a very unexpected detour a little over 15 years ago, when he began remixing classic albums by heavyweight rock acts like <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rollingstone.com\/t\/the-who\/\" id=\"auto-tag_the-who\" data-tag=\"the-who\">the Who<\/a>, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rollingstone.com\/t\/rolling-stones\/\" id=\"auto-tag_rolling-stones\" data-tag=\"rolling-stones\">Rolling Stones<\/a>, Pink Floyd, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rollingstone.com\/t\/black-sabbath\/\" id=\"auto-tag_black-sabbath\" data-tag=\"black-sabbath\">Black Sabbath<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rollingstone.com\/t\/king-crimson\/\" id=\"auto-tag_king-crimson\" data-tag=\"king-crimson\">King Crimson<\/a>. It didn\u2019t take him long to become one of the most acclaimed remixers in the industry, creating new stereo, 5:15 surround, and Atmos mixes for some of the most beloved albums in rock history.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tHe\u2019s become so popular in the audiophile community that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rollingstone.com\/t\/yes\/\" id=\"auto-tag_yes\" data-tag=\"yes\">Yes<\/a> even advertised the new editions of their classic Seventies albums as \u201cThe Steven Wilson Remixes\u201d and placed his name prominently on all the packaging.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tThere\u2019s never a moment where he\u2019s not working on multiple remix projects at once, and he manages to do this while making new records on his own and with a reunited Porcupine Tree. \u201cI\u2019ve always liked to have lots of balls up in the air simultaneously,\u201d Wilson tells <em>Rolling Stone<\/em> via Zoom from a hotel room in S\u00e3o Paulo, Brazil. \u201cI get bored quickly. And it really doesn\u2019t feel like a job sometimes when you\u2019re being asked to do these remix projects. It\u2019s been such a privilege and such a joy, and I\u2019ve learned so much from doing it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tThe seeds of Wilson\u2019s interest in remix work were planted back in 2002, when his label commissioned veteran music producer Elliot Scheiner to create a 5:1 remix of a new Porcupine Tree record. \u201cI didn\u2019t really like it,\u201d Wilson says. \u201cAnd it wasn\u2019t because Elliot hadn\u2019t done a good job, it\u2019s just because I\u2019m a control freak, and he hadn\u2019t done it the way I would have done it. I called up my manager, and I said, \u2018Look, is there any way I can fly over to New York and sit with Elliot and just make a few changes?&#8217;\u201d<\/p>\n<section class=\"brands-most-popular \/\/ editors-pick-module lrv-u-margin-tb-2 lrv-u-border-a-2 u-box-shadow-5-5 lrv-u-padding-lr-1 a-span1 u-padding-b-1@tablet u-overflow-hidden\">\n<h2 id=\"section-heading\" class=\"c-heading larva  lrv-u-text-align-center u-border-color-black a-font-theme-primary-xxs lrv-u-color-black lrv-u-text-transform-uppercase u-letter-spacing-0063 lrv-u-padding-t-050 u-padding-b-0375@tablet lrv-u-padding-b-050@mobile-max lrv-u-border-b-2\">\n<p>\t\tEditor\u2019s picks<\/p>\n<\/h2>\n<\/section>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tSitting alongside Scheiner in the studio and observing the process, Wilson knew he\u2019d found his calling. \u201cI thought to myself, \u2018This is amazing,&#8217;\u201d he says. \u201cI fell in love with the whole notion at that point of immersive spatial audio. I flew home, set myself up, started doing it for my own projects. And within a couple of years, I started to get Grammy nominations.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tTo music fans not immersed in the technicalities of music production, there might seem to be little distinction beyond a remaster and a remix. But they\u2019re actually quite different. Remastering started in the Nineties, when record labels attempted to improve the sound of older albums on CD.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\t\u201cThat\u2019s taking the original stereo mix, presumably from an analog tape, and basically just trying to make it sound a bit more impressive,\u201d says Wilson, \u201cmaybe adding a little bit more treble to it, a little more bottom into it, using the best possible analog to digital converters. But essentially it\u2019s the original mix. You\u2019re not changing anything in the sonic signature of the original stereo mix. It might just sound a bit more clear. There might be a bit more bottom end, a bit more air around the instruments if it\u2019s been done well.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tA remix is something very different. \u201cThat means going back to the original multi-track tape,\u201d says Wilson. \u201cSo essentially what you have there is each instrument discretely recorded. As the remixer, you are able to isolate everything from the bass drum, to each backing vocal part, to each acoustic guitar part, to each guitar part, to each bass. You\u2019re able to essentially start to rebuild the mix from scratch.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tThis involves making all sorts of very delicate decisions. \u201cThe advantage there is being able to use a lot of modern tools to deal with things like tape hiss, hum, audio anomalies, and to try to get more clarity around the instruments,\u201d Wilson says. \u201cThe downside of that is that the fans of those albums have been listening to them for sometimes decades. And they will hear at a moment\u2019s notice if something feels slightly off, if the reverb tail is a little bit too short, or you\u2019ve used the wrong take of the backing vocal on the third verse. So this is a very, very delicate tightrope to walk.\u201d<\/p>\n<section class=\"brands-most-popular \/\/ recirculation-modules lrv-u-margin-tb-2 lrv-u-border-a-2 u-box-shadow-5-5 lrv-u-padding-lr-1 a-span1 u-padding-b-1@tablet u-overflow-hidden\">\n<h2 id=\"section-heading\" class=\"c-heading larva  lrv-u-text-align-center u-border-color-black a-font-theme-primary-xxs lrv-u-color-black lrv-u-text-transform-uppercase u-letter-spacing-0063 lrv-u-padding-t-050 u-padding-b-0375@tablet lrv-u-padding-b-050@mobile-max lrv-u-border-b-2\">\n<p>\t\tRelated Content<\/p>\n<\/h2>\n<\/section>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tAfter all these years, Wilson has become an expert when it comes to walking that tightrope. We spoke with him about eight of his most memorable remixes to learn more about his process.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"King Crimson - In The Court Of The Crimson King (Album Visualiser)\" width=\"1200\" height=\"675\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/0ju5LRTMFLw?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<h2 id=\"king-crimson-in-the-court-of-the-crimson-king\" class=\"heading larva \/\/   lrv-a-font-primary-l   \">\n\t\t<strong>King Crimson, <em>In the Court of the Crimson King<\/em><\/strong>\t<\/h2>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tThat was an interesting one because it was recorded on eight-track, but they had the original session reels, too. The work process of that album was guitar, bass, and drums would go down onto an eight-track tape. That means bass drum, snare drum, stereo drum mix, bass guitar, mono, and a couple of guitar parts. So it would fill up seven tracks on an eight-track tape. They would then mix that onto a single mono track or a stereo channel on a second eight-track tape. So now we have a situation where we have an eight-track tape where the drums, bass, and the guitar are on just two tracks on an eight-track tape. So we\u2019ve got six channels we can still fill. And then they would go on to fill those channels with the Mellotron parts, the wind parts, and the lead vocal parts.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tThe fact that they still had those original drum, bass, guitar session reels meant that I was able to resynchronize those with the reduction reels and create for myself something like a 13- or 14-channel session. It also meant that for the first time ever, the drums, bass, and guitar were being heard as first generation in a mix.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tIt\u2019s very unusual to actually have access to the original pre-bounced rhythm-track session reels to be able to resynchronize them. It was quite a painful process because no two analog tapes ever run at the same speed. So basically you are having to constantly adjust the speed of the second reel. But over a very long painstaking process, I was able to create a 13-, 14-channel session mix, which meant I had a lot more separation, a lot more control over where I could place the bass, the guitar, and the drums apart from each other. Because every mix you\u2019ve ever heard before [of this album], they\u2019ve been basically just a mono bounce. So they were always in the same place. Working in Atmos now, I was able to start to move those things out. And we got back a generation of audio bounce having not had to use the reduction version of those instruments on the second reel. So that was a really interesting experiment.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"The Fish (Schindleria Praematurus) (Steven Wilson Remix)\" width=\"1200\" height=\"900\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/2oKF-wtQazg?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<h2 id=\"yes-fragile\" class=\"heading larva \/\/   lrv-a-font-primary-l   \">\n\t\t<strong>Yes, <em>Fragile<\/em><\/strong>\t<\/h2>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tThat was a 16-track recording. It\u2019s interesting, you can almost guess from the year what the multi-track\u2019s going to be. So if you say to me, okay, <em>Fragile<\/em>, recorded in 1971, I can be pretty sure it\u2019s going to be a 16-track recording. And it was. But you know what? It\u2019s still essentially the sound of a band playing live in the studio when you listen to a record like that. And there are overdubs, of course there are overdubs, and there is a complexity to the way the album is produced.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tBut essentially any record still made throughout the 1970s, that one included, you\u2019re still listening to bands recording a live performance in the studio. And they\u2019ll record it, in the case of Yes, 50 or 60 times before they say that\u2019s the one, that\u2019s the take. And then once they\u2019ve got that take, they\u2019ll start to add the other elements, the backing vocals, the acoustic guitars, the sound design elements. But essentially, it\u2019s still a fairly economically recorded album.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tIt\u2019s also a very dry album. The drum sound is very dry, very upfront. That\u2019s the Bill Bruford sound. So there\u2019s not a lot of additional reverb added. This is the big change going from the Seventies into the Eighties, I would say. The amount of processing and reverberation in the Seventies is still relatively minimal. You have a lot of dry drum sounds, a lot of dry guitar tones. And then in the Eighties, suddenly you have massive stadium reverbs added to everything.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tSo here\u2019s an album just on the cusp of the new decade into the early Seventies. Sixteen-track is a relatively new thing, and this is a band that are really making use of it. They\u2019re saying to themselves, \u201cYou know what, we\u2019ve got these extra channels on the tape. What can we do? What complex multi-part harmonies can we add?\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tThe progressive movement is very interesting because it\u2019s not only about the music, it\u2019s also about the availability of overdubbing that suddenly comes along in a way that it wasn\u2019t really there. I mean, obviously the Beatles were making use of overdubbing, but it\u2019s suddenly available to all bands, the option to record it like you would when you were playing live. You can go and add a cellist part, or you can go and add a harpsichord part, or you can rent a theremin and add a theremin part. Or you could add five layers of backing vocals if you want. And I think that\u2019s something that the progressive movement was very good in taking advantage of.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Movin&#039; In (Steven Wilson Remix) (2016)\" width=\"1200\" height=\"900\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/RCXJG6_0fkE?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<h2 id=\"chicago-chicago-ii\" class=\"heading larva \/\/   lrv-a-font-primary-l   \">\n\t\t<strong>Chicago, <em>Chicago II<\/em><\/strong>\t<\/h2>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tWhat a great record. That was also a 16-track record. But it was not a particularly well-recorded record. And famously people had always said it sounded very muffled. That was really initially a commission to create a new stereo mix. In fact, the stereo mix came out way back in 2019, and the Atmos was only done relatively recently, almost as an afterthought.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tBut the initial commission there was to try to deal with some of the issues that had always been there on the original stereo mix, which was very\u2026 I mean, who knows why? Could have been the desk they were using. Could have been they were all stoned. Could have been they were in a rush to get back out on the road. Who knows? But certainly compared to the first album, which sounds beautiful, the second album always had a very kind of middly, quite harsh tone. Tonally, it was quite harsh. Everyone used to say that the horns sound like kazoos on that record, which is a slight overstatement. But what they were kind of getting at was that there was something that was a little bit thin, tinny, and harsh about the original stereo mix.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tThat was an interesting opportunity to go in and try and find a little bit more. I mean, obviously some of that is baked into the way it was recorded, but there was a lot I felt I could do, there was a lot I felt I managed to do with that record to make it shine and to bring out some of the instruments. Put some more tone into them, put some more clarity into them, put more air around the instruments. And I always loved that record. So that was a real labor of love to try and bring something new out of it.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Grateful Dead - Candyman [Steven Wilson 5.1 Mix]\" width=\"1200\" height=\"675\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/CtXsIKzpsWc?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tI mean there\u2019s the complete opposite example. It\u2019s an incredibly beautiful record. Stephen Barncard was the engineer. He\u2019s an amazing engineer. He also did that amazing first David Crosby <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rollingstone.com\/music\/music-features\/david-crosby-if-i-could-only-remember-my-name-guide-1238716\/\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/www.rollingstone.com\/music\/music-features\/david-crosby-if-i-could-only-remember-my-name-guide-1238716\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">solo record<\/a>. These are just beautifully recorded albums.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tThe idea with <em>American Beauty<\/em> was to try and find a way to put the Dead into space, quite literally into space. And it\u2019s a difficult one. I\u2019ve just done <em>Blues for Allah<\/em> as well, which is a slightly different kettle of fish because it\u2019s a much more impressionistic record, much more sound design, much more experimental. <em>American Beauty<\/em> isn\u2019t really. It\u2019s a very traditional-sounding record.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tSo what do you do with that? What do you do with a record like that when you\u2019re mixing it into Dolby Atmos when you\u2019re positioning things around the listener? The answer is that don\u2019t do anything gimmicky. You don\u2019t have things moving around the room. What you do is you position the listener inside the studio, inside the band as they\u2019re performing those songs.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tYou may have Jerry\u2019s guitar over there, and you may have the piano player over there. But you kind of leave those things there in that space for the duration of that piece of music. So as you sit there in the room listening to the Atmos mix, you\u2019re in the studio while they cut that track. And it\u2019s so beautiful, so beautiful.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Won&#039;t Get Fooled Again (Remastered 2022)\" width=\"1200\" height=\"900\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/JdYyaX9Lrv4?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<h2 id=\"the-who-who-s-next\" class=\"heading larva \/\/   lrv-a-font-primary-l   \">\n\t\t<strong>The Who, <em>Who\u2019s Next<\/em><\/strong>\t<\/h2>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tWhen I\u2019m approaching <em>Who\u2019s Next<\/em>, I\u2019m trying to be as faithful as I can to the original sonic signature, the original mix, as I can. This album is an eight-track recording. We haven\u2019t yet arrived at 16-track. So Keith Moon\u2019s drums are mostly recorded as a mono signal. There\u2019s not a lot I can do there. The drums are just going to have to sit where they sit. I can\u2019t spread them out around the listener the way I might like to. So again, there are limitations kind of inherent in the fact you\u2019re working on an eight-track recording.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tBut there are things added to the mix. The reverb is so fundamental on that record, the reverb on Roger\u2019s voice, trying to get the signature of that. And what\u2019s interesting sometimes is that nowadays there are digital emulations of almost every piece of equipment that\u2019s ever been. And fantastic ones.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tI speak to a lot of the original producers. I\u2019ve just done the Phil Collins catalog. And I\u2019m able to speak to Hugh Padgham, the original producer, and say, \u201cWhat reverb were you using?\u201d And he\u2019ll say, \u201cOh, we were using the EMT 140, or we were using Lexicon 244,\u201d and that information is gold to me, absolutely gold to me.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tSo in the case of <em>Who\u2019s Next,<\/em> I was able to find out that they were using. They were using actual chambers. There were recording studios where they had these big rooms that were the echo chambers. But they were also using the EMT 140, a very famous vintage reverb. So a lot of my work, particularly with an album like that which is so iconic, is trying to match the reverb, the echo, the sound on the voice that makes it sound like it\u2019s in a space. Getting that wrong is such a giveaway.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tThe one thing that drives me crazy is when I hear Sixties,  Seventies recordings with Eighties, Nineties, or even more modern digital reverbs. It drives me nuts. It just sounds wrong. And I appreciate there\u2019s a kind of paradox there that says, well, I\u2019m remixing albums in the computer in 2025 that were recorded decades ago. But I think there is a way to get close. So there\u2019s a great example. Trying to match the reverb on <em>Who\u2019s Next<\/em> was a big part of getting that to sound right.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"van-morrison-moondance\" class=\"heading larva \/\/   lrv-a-font-primary-l   \">\n\t\t<strong>Van Morrison, <em>Moondance<\/em><\/strong>\t<\/h2>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tI said how earlier the Grateful Dead album was a band in the studio live, but some of it was still overdubbed. They still redid their vocals. Van did nothing after the session. Literally what you hear is the live take of the band, including his lead vocal. I know this because I can hear his lead vocal leaking onto every other channel in the studio. So you can hear his lead vocal take on the drum mics, you can hear it on the guitar mics, you can hear it on the piano mics, you can hear it on the bass mics. But the point is, you can hear everything on every mic. So you can hear the drums on the vocal mic, you can hear the bass on the guitar mic.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tIt\u2019s very much capturing a live performance in the studio. So again, I took a similar kind of approach that I did with the Dead there, which is this is a live band in the studio. Let\u2019s put the listener right in the middle of the studio with Van and his band as they cut \u201cCaravan,\u201d as they cut \u201cInto the Mystic.\u201d And I think there is something beautiful about that. When you hear the Atmos mix, you can see the piano player over there. You can see the double bass player over there. You can hear the sax player over there. And it\u2019s amazing. If you love that record, I think it\u2019s an amazing, amazing way to re-experience it.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"black-sabbath-vol-4\" class=\"heading larva \/\/   lrv-a-font-primary-l   \">\n\t\t<strong>Black Sabbath, <em>Vol. 4<\/em><\/strong>\t<\/h2>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tFor this one, we had session reels. We didn\u2019t have the master takes. Now, this has happened to me a couple of times actually, where I\u2019ve been sent what are supposedly the multi-track tapes for an album. And I load them all up and I start listening to them. And I\u2019m like, \u201cOK, well that\u2019s the band running through multiple takes of \u2018Wheels of Confusion.\u2019 But where\u2019s the master take? Where\u2019s the master take they added all the overdubs to? It\u2019s not there.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tWhat happens sometimes is that they would fill reels and reels and reels with takes of the band just running through the song live. The band runs through the song live, usually with Ozzy doing what\u2019s called a scratch vocal, a live vocal that would be replaced later on. But they\u2019re looking to get a good performance of particularly the drums, the rhythm guitar, and the bass guitar.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tSo they\u2019re running through all these takes with Ozzy doing a scratch vocal. And then they would get the take they liked. It would be cut out of the tape that it was on, and spliced into a new reel, which was called the master takes reel. Those disappeared. So the master takes reels for Black Sabbath <em>Vol. 4<\/em> disappeared. But what we did have is we had the band running through multiple takes of the songs. It\u2019s not great, but it meant the record label could put together a nice deluxe edition.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tBut what we couldn\u2019t do is we couldn\u2019t do any remixing or Atmos mixing of the actual masters themselves. What we were able to put together was a really nice sort of CD or two of the band working in the studio with breakdowns. And I mean, for the people that like that kind of thing\u2026 I appreciate it\u2019s very much a niche thing, but some people like that stuff. Again, those people for whom that\u2019s their favorite album of all time, they probably find it fascinating to hear the takes and the breakdowns.<\/p>\n<section class=\"brands-most-popular \/\/ recirculation-modules trending-in-article lrv-u-margin-tb-2 lrv-u-border-a-2 u-box-shadow-5-5 lrv-u-padding-lr-1 a-span1 u-padding-b-1@tablet u-overflow-hidden\">\n<h2 id=\"section-heading\" class=\"c-heading larva  lrv-u-text-align-center u-border-color-black a-font-theme-primary-xxs lrv-u-color-black lrv-u-text-transform-uppercase u-letter-spacing-0063 lrv-u-padding-t-050 u-padding-b-0375@tablet lrv-u-padding-b-050@mobile-max lrv-u-border-b-2\">\n<p>\t\tTrending Stories<\/p>\n<\/h2>\n<\/section>\n<h2 id=\"the-rolling-stones-black-and-blue\" class=\"heading larva \/\/   lrv-a-font-primary-l   \">\n\t\t<strong>The Rolling Stones, <em>Black and Blue<\/em><\/strong>\t<\/h2>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tThat was amazing to do. It\u2019s a 24-track recording. Some people say they think it\u2019s sonically the best sounding Stones record of the Seventies, and I might go along with that. It does sound fantastic. But there\u2019s a little bit more in terms of overdubbing on those records. There are guests, since they were basically auditioning different guitar players as they\u2019re cutting that record. So you have all these different guitar parts. You have the backing singers. You have Billy Preston on keyboards.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paragraph larva \/\/ lrv-u-line-height-copy  lrv-a-font-body-l   \">\n\tSome of the ballads, particularly \u201cMemory Motel\u201d and \u201cFool to Cry,\u201d are quite textured. Some beautiful guitar, Fender Rhodes, and keyboard overdubs. That sounds absolutely beautiful in Atmos. But again, it is very much trying to put you in the studio with the band. They\u2019re not what I call sound-design-orientated records. When you get into artists like Tears for Fears, Frankie Goes to Hollywood, which are also things I\u2019ve done recently, these are very much sound-design-orientated records. They\u2019re almost producers\u2019 records where they\u2019re looking for little sonic events to kind of pepper the tracks with. That\u2019s not the case with a live rock &amp; roll band like the Stones. But I think they sound beautiful in immersive spatial audio.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.rollingstone.com\/music\/music-features\/steven-wilson-best-remixes-who-dead-stones-sabbath-1235453878\/\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If Steven Wilson did nothing with his career besides form Porcupine Tree, he\u2019d still go down in music history as the leader of arguably&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":50271,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-50270","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-pop","article","has-excerpt","has-avatar","has-author","has-date","has-comment-count","has-category-meta","has-read-more","thumbnail-"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/musicianvoice.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50270","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/musicianvoice.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/musicianvoice.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/musicianvoice.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/musicianvoice.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50270"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/musicianvoice.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50270\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/musicianvoice.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/50271"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/musicianvoice.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50270"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/musicianvoice.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50270"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/musicianvoice.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50270"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}